165 mm is NOT a large blade

Highly technical & extremely controversial topics. Not for the faint of heart
Post Reply
Gerardo
Posts: 1
Joined: September 1st, 2022, 7:21 pm
Country: Honduras
State and City: Namasigue
My blade:
Forehand Rubber:
Backhand Rubber:
Playing Style: All round defensive
Grip: Shakehand

165 mm is NOT a large blade

Post by Gerardo »

For God's sake, please stop referring to popular production blades that are only around 165 mm as large blades.
These are NOT large blades.
A large blade is 170 mm by 170 mm
A super large blade is 175 mmby 175 mm

Most production blades like Butterfly Matsushita, Butterfly Joo Sae Hyuk are pure garbage in the 40+ plastic ball ONLY era.

How hard i s it to understand this ? The ball size has increased more than 2 mm but larger blades ae not available for defenders from commerical manufacturers.
Post Reply