IgorPonger & his usual lies Re: Antispin in European Championships

This forum respects the rights of ITTF Worship forums,who generally ban posts that are critical of IOC or ITTF. You are welcome to post them here if you have saved them
Post Reply
User avatar
Sbastian
Posts: 6
Joined: September 21st, 2022, 7:00 pm
Country: Spain España
City & State: Dos Hermanas
Playing Style: ..
Grip: ..
Cohort: General (Youth / Adult)
My blade:
Blade Type: .
Side F rubber brand:
Side F rubber type: .
Side B rubber brand:
Side B rubber type: .
Orientation: .

IgorPonger & his usual lies Re: Antispin in European Championships

Post by Sbastian »

igorponger wrote: on Monday 02/09/2026 at 6:33pm

LOW-FRICTION АNTI SHALL BE RESTRICTED BY CoF. HERE WE STAND.

Since antispin rubbers are now supposed to grow in popularity with competitive players exponentially, we ought to set friction limits for all rubber materials of the type. No "zero friction topsheet" is accepted in competitive sport for obvious lack of dynamical traction. Haotic unpredictable ball bounce makes the sport a game of chance. The lowest admissible CoF for sandwich anti rubbers we designated at 0.25
There is no such rule or regulation for antispin rubbers limiting the required minimum COF at 0.25
He is talking about a possible proposed change & makes it sound like an existing one

There is however a required minimum COF for pips. It was 0.25 before 2008 & changed to 0.50 with the infamous frictionless pips ban
Mehriban2
Posts: 11
Joined: November 20th, 2022, 9:34 pm
Country: Azərbaycan Azerbaijan
City & State: Mingachevir
Playing Style: ..
Grip: ..
Cohort: .
My blade: DHS Fan Bo Carbon ALC CPH
Blade Type: .
Side F rubber brand: Globe Magic Wand
Side F rubber type: .
Side B rubber brand: Bomb HAMMER Tension
Side B rubber type: .
Orientation: .

Re: IgorPonger & his usual lies Re: Antispin in European Championships

Post by Mehriban2 »

You can tell right away it is a lie by Igorponger.
Because if ITTF wanted a limit, why would they allow 0.25 for anti while they limited it to 0.5 for pips? :D :roll:
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “(AI:Artificial Ignorance & NS: Natural Stupidity)> Replies banned in ITTF Worship Forums”