If you want to have at least somewhat close to a fair & level playing field, wouldn't an AR (Aspect Ratio) of 1.5 make sense ?
It is not like defenders are asking for reduction of total rubber thickness from 4 mm to 3.5 mm and truly enforce ban on boosting & speed-gluing ?
Isn't an AR (Aspect ratio) 1.5 is a fair value for a level playing field ?
-
Hannii Punnagai Poo
- Posts: 1
- Joined: August 30th, 2022, 1:17 am
- Country: Malaysia
- State and City: Petaling Jaya
- My blade:
- Forehand Rubber:
- Backhand Rubber:
- Playing Style: -
- Grip: -
-
Petra
- Posts: 1
- Joined: September 1st, 2022, 1:19 am
- Country: Sweden
- State and City: Gothenburg
- My blade:
- Forehand Rubber:
- Backhand Rubber:
- Playing Style: -
- Grip: -
Re: Isn't an AR (Aspect ratio) 1.5 is a fair value for a level playing field ?
ITTF cannot do that though they clearly know that would reduce third & fifth ball attacks and make the rallies a little longer for betetr spectator interest.
Because ITTF has fiduciary responsibility & interests of the majority & the robotNazis have the highest priority & ITTF had workde so hard since 1983 to protect the intesrest of robotNazis with 8 rule and regulation changes to severely limit the capabilities of pips & anti players, since ITTF cannot reallyban all pips & anti for financial, political & monopolistic controllability of the sport reasons
ITTF just cannot turn the clock back now.
Because ITTF has fiduciary responsibility & interests of the majority & the robotNazis have the highest priority & ITTF had workde so hard since 1983 to protect the intesrest of robotNazis with 8 rule and regulation changes to severely limit the capabilities of pips & anti players, since ITTF cannot reallyban all pips & anti for financial, political & monopolistic controllability of the sport reasons
ITTF just cannot turn the clock back now.