Juic Leggy (Classic or first version)

As most of you may not know for sure, pips rubbers listed on ITTF LARC are 200% functionally useless in the 40+ plastic ball ONLY era. This section is for discussion about older rubbers from 38 mm ball era & 40- celluloid ball ere that may be still more functionally useful in the 40+ plastic ball era than rubbers designed for 40+ plastic ball ONLY era. This section also discusses new rubbers that are not listed on ITTF LARC but are functionally superior to rubbers currently listed on current ITTF LARC. Contrary to popular myth ITTF is NOT the sole supreme authority on table tennis & you are free to use these super functional rubbers as you wish. The question of who will play against you is a just only a matter of who are your true friends in table tennis & not ITTF rules or regulations especially at lower levels & especially in tournaments not affiliated with ITTF (incorrectly referred to as “unsanctioned” tournaments)
Post Reply
User avatar
Ralph 23
Posts: 17
Joined: March 9th, 2023, 2:03 pm
Country: Deutschland Germany
City & State: Heidelberg
Playing Style: ..
Grip: ..
Cohort: .
My blade: Custom
Blade Type: .
Side F rubber brand: Yinhe Mercury 3
Side F rubber type: .
Side B rubber brand: Magic 77
Side B rubber type: .
Orientation: .

Juic Leggy (Classic or first version)

Post by Ralph 23 »

The first version of Juic Leggy was banned by the 1998 Durban Aspect Ratio Reduction.
The 1998 Durban Aspect Ratio Reduction reduced the maximum allowed Aspect Ratio from 1.3 to 1.1 resulting significant back spin production capability.
Juic Leggy R (listed on ITTF LARC) wth lowered Aspect Ratio & which was released after1998 is pure garbage.
Top
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Please only use Super Functional Rubbers (not listed on ITTF LARC) as much as possible”