What are the 4 (deliberately) most confusing rubber type names under ITTF LARC classification ?

So you think you have reached a point nased on your experence, skill level & knowldge of history of the sport that you are well qualified to freely dish out advice on other ITTF worship forums ?
Can you pass this test ?
Hint : The answers to almost all these questions should ne elsewhere in this forum on other sub forums if you look for it. If you want yje wrong or political (and biased) answers look in any of iTTF worship forums
Post Reply
User avatar
Camel Glue
Posts: 14
Joined: August 16th, 2022, 12:17 pm
Country: Australia
City & State: North Sydney Leagues Table Ten
My blade:
Forehand Rubber:
Backhand Rubber:
Playing Style: Loop & block
Grip: J/K Pen (Japanese / Korean Penhold) HPG (Hybrid Penhold= TPG+RPG)

What are the 4 (deliberately) most confusing rubber type names under ITTF LARC classification ?

Post by Camel Glue »

So what are the four most confusing rubber types under its classification in LARC ?
User avatar
driverbeat
Posts: 1
Joined: September 3rd, 2022, 7:42 pm
Country: Singapore
City & State: Jalan Kukoh,
My blade: XVT Viscaria Clone
Forehand Rubber: DHS 889
Backhand Rubber: Hurricane 9 National
Playing Style: All round
Grip: Shakehand

Re: What are the 4 (deliberately) most confusing rubber type names under ITTF LARC classification ?

Post by driverbeat »

Both in and anti are in(verted). type rubbers.
So anti is also in(verted)
The name anti is the least confusing of all 4 rubber typr names
It would make sense to call rubbers named as "in" as spinverted (Spin in) as in spinny inverted and call "anti" as "anti in"

The other 2 names for rubber types, "out" & "long" are more confusing (by design by ITTF)
Because to start with both "out" and "long" are pips "out" rubbers.
So it would have made little sense at least to call them "short" and "long"

Unfortunately all "long" pips were banned in 1983 when ITTF set the maximum allowed pip length to 2.0 mm.
But ITTF does not want the choppers, the most ignorant fools of table tennis, to know this.
That is why ITTF had been calling the previously long pips as long pips for more than 43 years now to deceive the chopper.
Because, keep in mind that the maximum allowed pip length for ANY pips is 2.0 mm. It is not like teh "long" pips type are longer than the so called "short" pips,
The only difference is the width of the pips. But iTTF doe snot want the pips players especially the choppers to understand this.
This is why ITTF has cleverly & brilliantly used the phrase "Aspect Ratio" to confuse the pips players, as if teh phrase "Aspect Ratio" is some sort parameter derived from relativistic quantum mechanics or something LOL

So the real difference between long and out is that long is not really long but they are actually slimmer & out is really not short but they are actually wider.
So it would make more sense to call the ITTF LARC pips as wide pips & slim pips A.
Also since the wide pips are usually stiffer and slim pips are more flexible , you can also call them stiff pips and flex pips

But for heavens sake, stop referring to useless social pips on ITTF LARC as "long" pips. They are not by a long shot (pun intended)
"Long" pips were banned around 1983 , almost as soon as they arrived around mid 1970's (mostly mostly due to the legendary chopper Liang Geliang & few other emerging choppers, to shut down their pips capabilities almost immedietely. The brutality & oppressionof pips players by robotNazis has started about 40 years ago and yet pips players , especially the now almost extinct choppers, have no freaking clue
Post Reply

Return to “So you think you are a TT expert ? Take this quiz”