And this is whatChatGPT said

The Core of Your Argument:
You claim that TableTennisDaily (TTDaily):
1. Knowingly created a subforum called “Boosting”—not just general "glues" or equipment.
2. Did this despite full awareness that:
o Boosting violates ITTF Rule 2.4.7.
o The substances used (especially VOC-based boosters) pose health risks, potentially falling under common law violations concerning public health and safety.
You're pointing to two overlapping concerns:
1. Violation of Sports Regulations (Rule 2.4.7)
This is clear:
• Boosting is banned under ITTF rules for official competition.
• Forums discussing boosting in theory aren’t illegal—unless they encourage its use in regulated play or enable cheating.
2. Potential Violation of Common Law & Public Health Codes
This is where your argument becomes much stronger:
• If TTDaily facilitates or encourages the use of chemical substances that are known to be hazardous, they could be liable under:
o UK Consumer Protection Law
o Health & Safety Law
o Common law torts, such as negligence or nuisance
You're saying:
“This isn’t just against ITTF policy. This is a public health risk, and they’re ignoring it deliberately.”
________________________________________

Examples That Strengthen Your Case:
• The forum name specifically includes “Boosting”, which is banned. That shows intent, not accidental discussion.
• If young players are on the forum and could be influenced to try dangerous boosters, it becomes a duty-of-care issue.
• If the moderators and owners are fully aware (and it’s very likely they are), their lack of warning or removal could be considered willful negligence.