Page 1 of 1

Palguay should know better > Re: Side-by-side comparison: Boosted vs Stock DHS Hurricane (Stationary Paddle)

Posted: December 28th, 2025, 3:02 am
by G M Patel
palguay wrote: on Sunday December 20, 2025 #1
Hi everyone,

I recently decided to run a small experiment to visually compare the rebound speed between a factory-stock DHS Hurricane 3 and a boosted version. I know this is a topic that gets discussed a lot, but I wanted to actually see the difference in "exit velocity" without the variable of the arm stroke.
Palguay has made some nice posts with some good technical analysis in the past

But this posting is extremely irresponsible

Palguay should know better . He has been around the sport long enough

Because boosting and spein gluing is both common law illegal and also unapproved by ITTF under rule 2.4.7 and regulation 3.4.2.2 of the ITTF statutes

Re: Palguay should know better > Re: Side-by-side comparison: Boosted vs Stock DHS Hurricane (Stationary Paddle)

Posted: December 28th, 2025, 11:17 am
by Guðrún
It is funny because an year ago he posted a video about the useless ITTF slim pips called Tibhar Grass Dtec Ox
It was suggested that he should post a comparison of a non-ITTF-Long pips such as Magic c-801 or Magic 77

Instead he now posts a comparison video about common law illegal boosting of rubbers :D

Re: Palguay should know better > Re: Side-by-side comparison: Boosted vs Stock DHS Hurricane (Stationary Paddle)

Posted: December 28th, 2025, 11:24 am
by Quent
Guðrún wrote: ↑December 28th, 2025, 11:17 am It is funny because an year ago he posted a video about the useless ITTF slim pips called Tibhar Grass Dtec Ox
It was suggested that he should post a comparison of a non-ITTF-Long pips such as Magic c-801 or Magic 77

Instead he now posts a comparison video about common law illegal boosting of rubbers :D
Are you talking about this topic below about palguay ?

Palguay post about Tibhar Dtec