Is MAGA (Make Antispin Great Again) a viable concept ? Veritas historiae
Posted: January 2nd, 2026, 3:35 am
No it is not
Anti was rejected by away from the table choppers as fast as it arrived within 3 or 4 years in early to mid 1970s
Because long pips quickly became the far superior weapon for away from the table choppers
And this is why ITTF had to quickly step in and ban all long pips at the Birmingham 1977 BGM
Ever since then both anti & slim pips have almost entirely became a tool for at the table block style players.
Though ITTF had been selling the big lie, calling the slim flex pips as long flex pips in its ITTF LARC.
And the manufacturers constantly brainwash clueless newbies into thinking that anti is a viable weapon for at the table choppers
But simple fact remains that even useless slim flex pips have a much better dynamic range are superior to anti even for at the table blockers
So no MAGA will never be a viable concept if you clearly understand the operational mechanics of anti compared to actual non-ITTF long flex pips or even ITTF's slim flex pips
Anti was rejected by away from the table choppers as fast as it arrived within 3 or 4 years in early to mid 1970s
Because long pips quickly became the far superior weapon for away from the table choppers
And this is why ITTF had to quickly step in and ban all long pips at the Birmingham 1977 BGM
Ever since then both anti & slim pips have almost entirely became a tool for at the table block style players.
Though ITTF had been selling the big lie, calling the slim flex pips as long flex pips in its ITTF LARC.
And the manufacturers constantly brainwash clueless newbies into thinking that anti is a viable weapon for at the table choppers
But simple fact remains that even useless slim flex pips have a much better dynamic range are superior to anti even for at the table blockers
So no MAGA will never be a viable concept if you clearly understand the operational mechanics of anti compared to actual non-ITTF long flex pips or even ITTF's slim flex pips