iocTT.com :Most advanced multi-lingual discussion forum for tabletennis (Factual / parody). Uncensored. Free discreet membership to post. Simple registration. No email needed.

I don’t see ITTF adopting any of this because of (continental) politics but for whatever it is worth, here it is

Best format for team championships such as Olympics or WTTTC or continental team tournaments such as Asian TTC or Euro TTC etc
In the current format of 5 singles , countries other than China have very little chance (especially women)
A different format as below may not help much to prevent this but at lease more drama for spectators
Before quarter-finals > All ties should be best 3 out of matches. 1 doubles Teams must play at least 3 players
Quarter-final , Semi-final & final ties (or at least semi finals and finals or most definitely at least finals) > best 4 of 7 matches. 2 doubles Teams must play at least 5 players . Of course the doubles teams must have different pairs
It forces teams to use their entire squad. China’s advantage is depth, but requiring 5 players means:
• They must expose weaker players.
• They cannot rely on 3 superstars.
• They must develop two stable doubles pairs, not one.
• They must train more left/right combinations.
This is the first realistic structural constraint that reduces China’s dominance without being artificial or discriminatory.
Two doubles matches
This is the unpredictability engine.
Doubles introduces:
• synergy
• chaos
• miscommunication
• serve/receive complexity
• left/right mismatches
Even China cannot fully control this.
Best of 7 matches
This gives room for:
• comebacks
• endurance
• momentum swings
• tactical adjustments
And it makes the event feel like a true championship.

Best format for doubles (men’s doubles, women’s double and mixed doubles) in individual championships such as Olympics or WITTC or continental individual championships such as Asian ITTC or Euro ITTC etc
Doubles pairs cannot be from same continent ( 7 continents not 5 > Americas divided into four > South, North, Central and Caribbean) . You could divide Asia , Europe and Asia each into weak and powerhouses in terms of TT as well as economy etc but it gets too messy so I won’t go there
Asia / Europe doubles pairs not allowed
Finals (or possibly semi-finals) will be best 5 of 7 games (not best 3 of 5 games)
These pairing will spur growth of the sport in weaker continents othe than Europe & Asia (& travel business for training between continents for player teams training )
This is a development driven rule, not a competitive one.
It forces:
• cross continental training
• cultural exchange
• tactical diversity
• weaker continents to partner with stronger ones
• more global visibility for players outside Asia/Europe
This is similar to:
• badminton’s mixed nation doubles in some invitational events
• tennis’s Laver Cup mixed teams
• table tennis’s own World Table Tennis Friendship Doubles (China + Japan, etc.)
Why it helps the sport
• Players from Africa, Oceania, Pan America get exposure to elite training.
• It breaks the Asia/Europe duopoly.
• It creates new storylines and rivalries.
• It increases global fan interest.
• It encourages travel and joint training camps.
This is a growth focused rule, not a “stop China” rule.
Finals (or semifinals) best of 7 games
✔ Why this is good
Doubles rallies are short, explosive, and emotional. A longer match:
• increases drama
• Endurance
• rewards tactical adjustments
• gives underdogs more time to settle
• feels like a true championship match
This is a natural upgrade for major finals.

How Doubles can Spur Growth of Table Tennis Worldwide
Doubles is not just an event — it is a growth engine for the sport at every level. Adding more doubles into major championships (team or individual) creates a ripple effect that strengthens table tennis globally.
1. Doubles lowers the skill barrier and increases participation
Singles at a high level is brutally technical. Doubles, by contrast:
• rewards teamwork over pure speed
• allows older players to stay competitive
• allows younger players to learn faster
• makes the sport more social and less intimidating
This is why recreational clubs grow faster when doubles is emphasized.
2. Doubles creates more pathways for smaller nations
Countries with fewer elite singles players can still produce:
• a great left/right pair
• a creative serve/receive specialist
• a defensive/offensive combination
This gives emerging nations a realistic chance to win matches they would never win in singles.
It democratizes the sport.
3. Doubles encourages cross training and international cooperation
When players must train with partners from:
• different styles
• different cultures
• different continents
…they develop faster and bring new ideas home. This accelerates the global evolution of the sport.
Your rule about cross continental doubles pairs amplifies this effect dramatically.
4. Doubles is more entertaining for spectators
Doubles has:
• faster rallies
• more shouting
• more emotion
• more tactical surprises
• more “WTF just happened” moments
Crowds respond to energy, not just technique. Doubles delivers that energy every time.
5. Doubles builds club culture
At the grassroots level:
• clubs run more doubles leagues
• more people can play at once
• beginners mix with advanced players
• social bonds form
• retention skyrockets
A sport grows when people stay, not just when they start.
Doubles keeps people in the sport.
6. Doubles creates more stars
A nation may not have a top 10 singles player, but it can have:
• a world class server
• a brilliant blocker
• a left handed specialist
• a defensive wizard
Doubles gives these players a platform. More stars = more media = more growth.
7. Doubles is the format that other booming racket sports rely on
This is where you can add your “pickleball” comparison.
Pickleball — the fastest growing racket sport in the USA — is over 80% doubles at the recreational and competitive level.
Why?
Because doubles is:
• social
• inclusive
• chaotic
• addictive
• easier to learn
• more fun for casual players
If table tennis wants to grow like pickleball, it must embrace the same principles not change the rackets to reduce spins especially backspin LOL

I am also aware of the fact that some players at all levels absolutely hate doubles while some other players absolutely love it. That will never change not only in table tennis but in all sports .That is human nature . Some humans are fiercely individualistic while other can adopt much better to team scenarios better. I am not much of a team player myself but as I get older I enjoy doubles more. But in the final analysis it comes down to what is better for the growth of sport
It is extremely easy anyone to play a meaningless “game” of ping pong but as soon as you enter the world of organized formal table tennis , it instantly starts to get intimidating even for intermediate players , let alone beginners. Even as an intermediate player when I started to improve, I was in total awe of even advanced players wondering if I would ever beat them (until I started beating them rather easily as I improved) This is where doubles can help immensely. When you pair an experienced player with a beginner , the intimidation factor starts to reduce drastically & the beginner starts to feel confutable with the sport.
So in effect doubles sort of becomes a free coaching format when teams with one high level player and one beginner play together. Also keep in mind that , unlike other racket sports, each player MUST alternate and this prevents strong player from trying to take over. Instead they have to sort of coach / train the weaker player
This is quite possibly one of many major factors that pickleball is exploding wildly (Just a disclaimer > Table tennis failed miserably trying to copy the equipment concepts of pickleball as in TTX or hardbat because the most distinguishing characteristic of tabletennis compared to other sports is NOT speed but it is diverse spins (or no spins) . But when you try to kill the spins factor as TTX & hardbat do in table tennis it will die quickly)

WTTTC > easier to implement
WITTC > harder to implement but still worth trying because benefits outweigh cost but Europe & Asia will likely resist strongly