I am really sick of seeing the pips & anti players increasing in numbers every day. This is very depressing.
We should all play using the same spinny inveretd rubbers both sides of the racket & that is only fair because majority of tabletennis players (about 70%) and isn't ITTF a democratic orgnaization ?
Plea to ITTF :- Please please ban all anti & pips rubbers
-
Ahmed 88
- Posts: 1
- Joined: June 22nd, 2022, 3:11 pm
- Country: الأردن Jordan
- City & State: Zarqa
- Playing Style: ..
- Grip: ..
- Cohort: .
- My blade: Butterfly Czech
- Blade Type: .
- Side F rubber brand: Butterfly Sriver Killer
- Side F rubber type: .
- Side B rubber brand: Yasaka Phantom 007
- Side B rubber type: .
- Orientation: .
-
Amandi
- Posts: 1
- Joined: June 23rd, 2022, 12:21 am
- Country: འབྲུག། Bhutan
- City & State: Jakar
- Playing Style: ..
- Grip: ..
- Cohort: .
- My blade: 729 crazy victory
- Blade Type: .
- Side F rubber brand: Yinhe Dingtian
- Side F rubber type: .
- Side B rubber brand: 755 Mystery 3
- Side B rubber type: .
- Orientation: .
Re: Plea to ITTF. Please please ban all anti & pips rubbers
ITTF will NEVER EVER ban longpips & anti rubbers.
Here is the simple reason. They learned their lesson in 1995 when they tried to ban speed glues altogether. When RobotNazis threatened to form their own separate association , ITTF quickly backed off and repeal the Speed Glue Ban immediately to save their jobs.
Even though the anti / pips players (aks spin(e)less cowards (long pips / anti players) and honorary loopers (short pips choppers)) are smaller in numbers compared to spinny inverted players, if ITTF bans pips and anti & if they form their own association it is total dilution of control and loss of revenue to ITTF
So ITTF is really very clever in this regard. ITTF knows all too well that it is much better to keep pips / anti players in their clutches & slowly limit their capabilities one rule or regulation after another ( 14 changes since 1977 ). Spin(e)less cowards (long pips / anti players) and honorary loopers (short pips choppers) have no clue as to what the ITTF is really "doing" to them.
If the ITTF really cared about diversity and all that silly nonsense they would have instituted a diversity education and sensitivity training for robotNazis like 20 years ago. But it is lot more fun to make change after rule change and have a good laugh at spin(e)less cowards (long pips / anti players) and honorary loopers (short pips choppers)
Here is the simple reason. They learned their lesson in 1995 when they tried to ban speed glues altogether. When RobotNazis threatened to form their own separate association , ITTF quickly backed off and repeal the Speed Glue Ban immediately to save their jobs.
Even though the anti / pips players (aks spin(e)less cowards (long pips / anti players) and honorary loopers (short pips choppers)) are smaller in numbers compared to spinny inverted players, if ITTF bans pips and anti & if they form their own association it is total dilution of control and loss of revenue to ITTF
So ITTF is really very clever in this regard. ITTF knows all too well that it is much better to keep pips / anti players in their clutches & slowly limit their capabilities one rule or regulation after another ( 14 changes since 1977 ). Spin(e)less cowards (long pips / anti players) and honorary loopers (short pips choppers) have no clue as to what the ITTF is really "doing" to them.
If the ITTF really cared about diversity and all that silly nonsense they would have instituted a diversity education and sensitivity training for robotNazis like 20 years ago. But it is lot more fun to make change after rule change and have a good laugh at spin(e)less cowards (long pips / anti players) and honorary loopers (short pips choppers)
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 1 Replies
- 1891 Views
-
Last post by Roberto^
-
- 1 Replies
- 3070 Views
-
Last post by Stofoulos
-
- 1 Replies
- 3082 Views
-
Last post by Sammiy
-
- 2 Replies
- 1838 Views
-
Last post by Utpal %
-
- 2 Replies
- 2215 Views
-
Last post by Von Backo
-
- 0 Replies
- 3643 Views
-
Last post by Sanna M
-
- 4 Replies
- 4451 Views
-
Last post by Abeeryn
-
- 2 Replies
- 2476 Views
-
Last post by Rinfarzando
-
- 0 Replies
- 2621 Views
-
Last post by Julif
-
- 1 Replies
- 1853 Views
-
Last post by James Z