Are cured/treated/fully frictionless pimples objectively more useless than hard frictionful pimples?

Highly technical & extremely controversial topics. Not for the faint of heart
Post Reply
Frerrri@
Posts: 3
Joined: September 5th, 2025, 11:17 am
Country: Italia
City & State: Giaveno
Playing Style: Loop & block
Grip: Shakehand
Cohort: Masters (Veterans)
My blade: Boer Offensive Energy Carbon
Blade Type: .
Side F rubber brand: DHS Hurricane 3 National
Side F rubber type: .
Side B rubber brand: Mo Avalox
Side B rubber type: .
Orientation: .

Re: Are cured/treated/fully frictionless pimples objectively more useless than hard frictionful pimples?

Post by Frerrri@ »

Yet to try C 801.
I am using Mo Avalox. Good blocking rubber

I do not know how treated rubbers are because I see no point in use them.
Mostly because it give excuse for pips haters especially those who boosting to complain.

I think pips players should work with manufacturers to provide them with pips that are longer around 2.5 mm
This applies to both cut players and block players.
This way at least you clearly are not modifying rubbers by treating them like boosters do.

If enough pips players do this and refuse to play without these pips then ITTF will have to either ban all pips or allow these pips
But these has to start with top pro players first.

But if top pro and semi pro players do nothing , then ITTF won't care and will try to continue ban these pips
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “For advanced (and above) tabletennis athletes”