Aspect Ratio Re:Potential changes to equipment rules

This forum respects the rights of ITTF Worship forums,who generally ban posts that are critical of IOC or ITTF. You are welcome to post them here if you have saved them
Post Reply
User avatar
Oleg Mikhail
Posts: 5
Joined: February 24th, 2023, 3:55 am
Country: Russia
City & State: Nizhny Novgorod
My blade:
Forehand Rubber:
Backhand Rubber:
Playing Style: ..
Grip: ..

Aspect Ratio Re:Potential changes to equipment rules

Post by Oleg Mikhail »

Mykonos96 wrote: Btw any knows where the info about the new pips aspect ratio and the specs that pips must comply?
What do you mean NEW ?
The Aspect Ratio(AR) was reduced by ITTF from 1.3 to 1.1 in 1998 to turn long pips into medium pips by bringing it closer to the short pips AR limit of 0.89& it has not changed since.
Only difference is that there are 8 more rule & regulation changes since 1998 to further restrict pips.
If you want to learn more about detailed calculation about pips aspect ratio read the web pages below (Click on links below)

Pip Design Parameters

Aspect Ratio detailed calculations
Rizzlet
Posts: 4
Joined: August 5th, 2022, 11:37 am
Country: United States of America (USA)
City & State: Tacoma Park, Maryland
My blade:
Forehand Rubber:
Backhand Rubber:
Playing Style: Loop & block
Grip: Shakehand

Re: Aspect Ratio Re:Potential changes to equipment rules

Post by Rizzlet »

Mykonos96 ,
Does it really even matter ?
ITTF fraudulently keeps calling useless social pips as long pips in their LARC doucment

Long pips were banned in 1983

ITTF has been very successful in sweeping this truth under the rug for more than 42 years
Post Reply

Return to “(AI:Artificial Ignorance & NS: Natural Stupidity)> Posts banned (or topics stolen) in ITTF Worship Forums”