More pure fiction about friction from IgorPonger Re: 'Friction Normalized' label for Anties.

This forum respects the rights of ITTF Worship forums,who generally ban posts that are critical of IOC or ITTF. You are welcome to post them here if you have saved them
Post Reply
Orla
Posts: 3
Joined: August 8th, 2022, 3:14 am
Country: Australia
City & State: Jabiru, NT
My blade:
Forehand Rubber:
Backhand Rubber:
Playing Style: Modern Defender (Loop & chop)
Grip: J/K Pen (Japanese / Korean Penhold) TPG (Traditional Penhold)

More pure fiction about friction from IgorPonger Re: 'Friction Normalized' label for Anties.

Post by Orla »

Igorponger wrote: on Friday, March 7, 2025 at 08:50
This is meant that a frictionless topsheet may be re-formulated in such a way as to comply with the requirement of minimum CoF > 0.3.
But the ITTF Technical Mnual of 2022 M4 already has a stricter C.O.F limit of limit 0.5 for both Antis & Pips
So if you are going to change it 0.3 , by all means go ahead because that would actually allow Antis to be MORE Frictionless not less Frictionless LOL
Salote
Posts: 13
Joined: December 30th, 2024, 5:01 pm
Country: New Zealand
City & State: Porirua
My blade:
Forehand Rubber:
Backhand Rubber:
Playing Style: All round
Grip: Shakehand

Re: More pure fiction about friction from IgorPonger Re: 'Friction Normalized' label for Anties.

Post by Salote »

Orla wrote: March 7th, 2025, 7:08 pm
Igorponger wrote: on Friday, March 7, 2025 at 08:50
This is meant that a frictionless topsheet may be re-formulated in such a way as to comply with the requirement of minimum CoF > 0.3.
But the ITTF Technical Mnual of 2022 M4 already has a stricter C.O.F limit of limit 0.5 for both Antis & Pips
So if you are going to change it 0.3 , by all means go ahead because that would actually allow Antis to be MORE Frictionless not less Frictionless LOL
Please refer to the following thread I posted a few days aho for more detailed information
Click link below

C.O.F. for Anti rubbers

I give credit to Debater in OOAK forum for initiating an analysis of this C.O.F. issue in ITTF M4 document , which I followed up as in above topic
Post Reply

Return to “(AI:Artificial Ignorance & NS: Natural Stupidity)> Posts banned (or topics stolen) in ITTF Worship Forums”