Page 1 of 1
More pure fiction about friction from IgorPonger Re: 'Friction Normalized' label for Anties.
Posted: March 7th, 2025, 7:08 pm
by Orla
Igorponger wrote: on Friday, March 7, 2025 at 08:50
This is meant that a frictionless topsheet may be re-formulated in such a way as to comply with the requirement of minimum CoF > 0.3.
But the ITTF Technical Mnual of 2022 M4 already has a stricter C.O.F limit of limit 0.5 for both Antis & Pips
So if you are going to change it 0.3 , by all means go ahead because that would actually allow Antis to be MORE Frictionless not less Frictionless LOL
Re: More pure fiction about friction from IgorPonger Re: 'Friction Normalized' label for Anties.
Posted: March 7th, 2025, 7:10 pm
by Salote
Orla wrote: ↑March 7th, 2025, 7:08 pm
Igorponger wrote: on Friday, March 7, 2025 at 08:50
This is meant that a frictionless topsheet may be re-formulated in such a way as to comply with the requirement of minimum CoF > 0.3.
But the ITTF Technical Mnual of 2022 M4 already has a stricter C.O.F limit of limit 0.5 for both Antis & Pips
So if you are going to change it 0.3 , by all means go ahead because that would actually allow Antis to be MORE Frictionless not less Frictionless LOL
Please refer to the following thread I posted a few days aho for more detailed information
Click link below
C.O.F. for Anti rubbers
I give credit to Debater in OOAK forum for initiating an analysis of this C.O.F. issue in ITTF M4 document , which I followed up as in above topic